In geometrical optics, a well focused conventional camera is seen to project an emitted intensity of a far distant object point onto the image plane in a way that its image point is sharply focused. Given the same focus setting, another projected point from a closer object would focus behind the sensor meaning that its directional rays are distributed over several positions on the image plane causing a blurred dot on the output image. The plenoptic camera overcomes this limitation by the aid of a micro lens array and an image processing technique which is indicated below.
As highlighted in the animation, the light intensity of an image point E'0(s0) emitted from M0 is distributed over image sensor locations Efs(u0, s0), Efs(u1, s0) and Efs(u2, s0). Hence, by summing up these Efs values, the intensity at point E'0(s0) is retrieved. Upon closer inspection, it may be apparent that each image point at plane E'0 is obtained by calculating the sum of all pixel values within the respective micro image s. A problem arises in case the sum E'0(s0) exceeds the maximum intensity that can be represented. In conventional photography, this artefact is known as clipping and can be solved by lowering the exposure. The same applies to the plenoptic camera, although, it is an alternative attempt to synthesise E'0 (s0) via the average mean of all pixels Efs being involved to form E'0(s0).
As suggested by the term refocusing, another object plane, e.g. M1, may be computationally brought into focus from the same raw image capture. For instance, light rays emanating from a plane M1 can be thought of projecting corresponding image points at E'1 behind the image sensor. The intensity of E'1(s0) is then recovered by integrating Efs intensities at positions (u2, s0), (u1, s1) and (u0, s2). From this example, it is seen that pixels selected to form image points behind the sensor are spread over several micro images. In general, it can be stated that the closer the refocusable object plane Ma to the camera, the larger the gap between micro lenses from which pixels have to be merged. Recalling the second figure shown in the Sub-aperture section, an analogue representation is depicted below showing an approach to accomplish refocusing from previously extracted sub-aperture images.
While investigating the image refocusing process, the question came up what the distance to a refocused object plane Ma and its depth of field might be. A solution to this is discussed below.
Refocusing Distance and Depth of Field
According to the section Refocusing, it is possible to trace chief rays back to object space planes where they have been emitted from. Given all lens parameters of the Standard Plenoptic Camera, the slope of each chief ray within the camera as well as in object space may be retrieved and described as a linear function in a certain interval (e.g. from sensor image plane to micro lens). To approximate the metric distance of a refocusing plane Ma, the system of two arbitrary chief ray functions intersecting at plane Ma is solved.
Based on the propositions made in section Model, a point u at the image sensor plane is seen to be of an infinitesimal size. However, lenses are known to diffract light and project a shape of an Airy pattern onto the image plane. Therefore, the width of u, which is due to lens diffraction, needs to be taken into consideration. Besides, sensor picture cells also have a finite size which is assumed to be greater than, or at least equal to, the lens diffraction pattern.
Considering the pixel size and tracing rays from the boundaries in the same manner as described in section Model also yields intersections in object space, denoted as da- and da+, in front of and behind the refocusing slice Ma, respectively. These planes indicate the depth of field of a single refocusing slice Ma. Object surfaces located within that depth range are 'in focus' meaning that the least blur is achieved in that area. Mathematical derivation and validation results for the distance and depth estimation are found below.
C. Hahne, A. Aggoun, and V. Velisavljevic, S. Fiebig, and M. Pesch "Refocusing distance of a standard plenoptic camera," Opt. Express 24, Issue 19, 21521-21540 (2016).
The refocusing distance of a standard plenoptic photograph [Invited Paper]
C. Hahne, A. Aggoun, and V. Velisavljevic, "The refocusing distance of a standard plenoptic photograph," in 3D-TV-Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON), 8-10 July 2015.
C. Hahne, A. Aggoun, S. Haxha, V. Velisavljevic, and J. Fernández, "Light field geometry of a standard plenoptic camera," Opt. Express 22, Issue 22, 26659-26673 (2014).
C. Hahne, A. Aggoun, S. Haxha, V. Velisavljevic, and J. Fernández, "Baseline of virtual cameras acquired by a standard plenoptic camera setup," in 3D-TV-Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON), 2-4 July 2014.
C. Hahne and A. Aggoun, "Embedded FIR filter design for real-time refocusing using a standard plenoptic video camera," Proc. SPIE 9023, in Digital Photography X, 902305 (March 7, 2014).
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me via info [ät] christopherhahne.de